Thinking about Income Plus Arbitrage Funds? Know the pros and cons, hidden risks, and why pure arbitrage funds may still be the safer alternative.
In the fast-changing world of mutual funds, innovation often walks a fine line between genuine need and marketing gimmick. After the government removed indexation benefits from debt mutual funds in 2023, many fund houses scrambled to find new ways to retain investor interest.
Enter the so-called “Income Plus Arbitrage Funds” — a cleverly branded category that promises better returns than savings accounts, equity-like taxation, and low risk.
Sounds perfect? Not so fast.
Before you get lured into these shiny new wrappers, it’s crucial to understand the truth behind the marketing and why you should stay away from these gimmicks.
Avoid Income Plus Arbitrage Funds: A Risky Tax Gimmick

No SEBI Recognition, No Clear Regulations
First and most importantly:
There is NO SEBI-defined category called an “Income Plus Arbitrage Fund.”
These funds are just internally designed hybrids, combining:
- Arbitrage trades (buy stock in cash market, sell futures of the same stock), and
- Debt investments (corporate bonds, treasury bills, commercial papers).
Because SEBI doesn’t regulate them under a specific framework, the fund manager enjoys wide discretion:
- One month, the portfolio could be 70% arbitrage and 30% debt.
- The next month, it could flip to 40% arbitrage and 60% debt.
- Worse, debt quality could vary — from safe government securities to riskier corporate bonds.
As an investor, you’re entering a grey zone without even realizing it.
You have no assurance about how your money will be allocated — especially in volatile markets.
Designed to Exploit the Tax Loophole
The real reason these products exist is simple:
To offer equity taxation benefits to conservative investors who otherwise would have stayed in safe debt funds or fixed deposits.
Because these “Income Plus” funds invest a minimum 65% in equities (through arbitrage), they qualify as equity funds for taxation:
- Short-Term Capital Gains (STCG) taxed at 20%.
- Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) above Rs.1.25 lakh taxed at 12.5%.
Compare this to pure debt funds, where:
- Short-term or long term gains are taxed at your slab rate (up to 30%) irrespective of your holding period.
No wonder AMCs are aggressively marketing this — not for your benefit, but to keep their AUM (assets under management) growing.
Hidden Risks Lurking Inside
Despite being projected as a “safe” parking spot for idle cash, these funds carry serious hidden risks:
1. Credit Risk from the Debt Portion
This is a huge concern. Without a clear mandate, such funds can take unwanted credit risk. Hence, knowingly or unknowingly, you end up with a risky debt portfolio.
- Fund managers might invest in lower-rated corporate bonds to boost returns.
- If the company defaults or faces a downgrade, the fund’s NAV could take a sudden hit.
- Remember Franklin Templeton’s debt fund crisis? Investors learned the hard way that credit risk is real.
Let us take the example of few funds. Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage FoF portfolio is holding around 59% of its portfolio in Kotak Corporate Bond Fund Direct Growth. Same way, DSP Income Plus Arbitrage Fund of Fund is holding around 46.5% of its holdings in DSP Banking and PSU Debt Fund – Direct Plan – Growth. Also, Bandhan Income Plus Arbitrage Fund of Funds is holding around 61% in it’s Bandhan Corporate Bond Fund – Direct Growth. HDFC Income Plus Arbitrage Active FoF – Direct Plan is holding around 53% in HDFC Corporate Bond Fund.
If you blindly look into other funds also, it is the same story. Hence, you have to ask yourself of how much comfortable you are in taking such BLIND risk.
2. Interest Rate Risk
- If interest rates rise sharply, the value of the debt holdings can fall and vice verse. If your debt portfolio consists of long term bonds, then such volatility is huge.
- This can erode the portfolio value, especially in short-term timeframes.
3. Liquidity Risk
- During times of market panic (e.g., March 2020 COVID crash), arbitrage spreads dried up.
- This means the so-called “safe” arbitrage strategy generated almost no return for months.
4. Portfolio Transparency Issues
- Unlike pure arbitrage funds or regulated debt funds, these hybrids do not disclose detailed, fixed mandates for asset allocation.
- Investors are blindly trusting fund managers — without knowing how much risk they are taking at any given time.
5. Majority of these funds are old wine in new bottle
If you look into the age of these funds, you will notice that few are showing as 3+, 5+, or 10+ years old. But don’t go by this. They are earlier in a different avatar than what they are today. For example, DSP Income Plus Arbitrage Fund of Fund was earlier DSP Global Allocation Fund of Fund. Kotak Income Plus Arbitrage FOF was earlier Kotak All Weather Debt FOF. Same way, Bandhan Income Plus Arbitrage Fund of Funds was earlier Bandhan All Seasons Bond Fund. ICICI Prudential Income Plus Arbitrage Active FoF, earlier version was ICICI Prudential Income Optimizer Fund (FOF). HDFC Income Plus Arbitrage Active FOF, earlier version was HDFC Dynamic PE Ratio Fund of Funds. I am just highlighting the few. You can cross check on your own with other funds, also. The story will remain the same.
6. Never rely on past returns
As these funds are the new version of earlier debt funds, it is hard to assume that past returns will continue in future. Hence, never compare the returns to judge that these are superior than Arbitrage Funds.
Why Plain Arbitrage Funds Are Safer
If your goal is tax efficiency + safety, then pure arbitrage funds are a far better option.
- Pure arbitrage funds are regulated clearly by SEBI.
- They only focus on hedged positions in stock markets — buying in cash and selling in futures.
- They avoid the complexity and risk of holding unknown debt instruments.
- Returns typically range from 5% to 7% per annum — far better than savings accounts or liquid funds, with far lower risk.
No unnecessary gimmicks. No hidden exposure. No worrying about what the fund manager is cooking behind the scenes.
Simple is always safer.
Don’t Be a Scapegoat
Let’s call a spade a spade:
“Income Plus Arbitrage Funds” are cleverly disguised traps to catch unsuspecting investors who are chasing post-tax returns.
Fund houses know that after debt fund taxation changes, they could lose a huge chunk of AUM.
So instead of innovating responsibly, they invented a blurry, loosely structured product — one that:
- Looks safe,
- Feels familiar,
- But hides significant risk under the hood.
As an investor, you should never fall for such gimmicks. Your money deserves better — clarity, transparency, and simplicity.
The Wise Investor’s Approach
- If your goal is idle money parking,
- If you want to earn better than a savings account,
- If you want tax efficiency without hidden risk,
then the path is clear: Stick to pure arbitrage funds.
You don’t need an “income plus” gimmick to achieve your goals. You need discipline, not desperate innovation. However, beware that Arbitrage Funds may generate few months of negative returns during equity market volatility (Can Arbitrage Funds give negative returns?).
Final Word: Stay Simple, Stay Safe
Income Plus Arbitrage Funds are not solutions. They are products designed to benefit fund houses, not investors. At a time when financial marketing is getting increasingly sophisticated, it’s more important than ever to stay rooted in simple, clear investment principles. Don’t be a scapegoat. Don’t trade safety for gimmicks. Stick to pure Liquid Fund or arbitrage funds for your short-term requirements.
Please stop passing half information. Firstly, your article says “income plus” funds have to maintain minimum 65% in equities which is not true. Correct information is that these funds have to maintain equity in range of 35% to 65%. And as per mandate of these funds, these funds intend to keep 35% in arbitrage (to fulfil criteria of tax advantage) and remaining they tend to invest in debt funds. Secondly, you mentioned they are designed to take tax advantage that of equities which is again not true. The truth is these are designed to take tax advantage of hybrid funds where equities to be maintained is between 35% to 65% and also holding period should be 2 years unlike 1 year of equity funds. Third, you mentioned there is no clear regulation for this category which is again not true. The truth is these are fund of fund (FoF) and hence these will invest 35% in arbitrage mutual fund and 65% in debt funds. Please check the recent budget of Feb 2025, government has allowed FoFs under the tax regulation if net equities is between 35 and 65%. Erstwhile, FoF structure was not allowed for tax benefit and was taxed as per tax slab so it is under regulation and is not a loop hole at all. There are lot of more wrong information in your article. Please take full information first and then talk in open forum.
Dear Harshit,
Thanks for commenting 🙂 Regarding the 65% in equities – I mentioned it specially as the idea of these funds is to qulify for equity fund taxation. Whether they mantain this through direct equity or through arbitrage is up to the fund manager. As per the new budget classificaiton, the fund will qualify for equity if it is investing at least 65% of its portfolio in equity and if it is a Fund Of Fund (FOF), then the condition is that it invests 90% of its assets in funds that, in turn, invest 90% of its assets in domestic equity (like Equity ETFs). I am unsure of what is wrong in my wordings of these funds desinged to take advantage of tax VS your wordings. Please refer the new categories defined to arrive at what should be the equity fund and debt fund (and Other Funds).
When I said regualtion, I mean to say that there is no such classificaiton by SEBI. It is a pure product designed with intention to feed the investors who are running behind tax advantage, high return alternatives than debt funds, FDs or Arbitrage Funds. Why not you discuss about the risk they are taking in thier debt portfolio BLINDLY??
Dear Basu,
Thanks for your deep insights. These words have struck a chord with me- “innovating responsibly” & “desperate innovation”. No wonder we are living in desperate times!
Dear Mayur,
My pleasure 🙂
Is SWP option is better choice for retires person?
Dear Debasish,
From where you are withdrawing matters not the just SWP. Refer my earlier post to understnd the risks involved “Systematic Withdrawal Plan SWP – Dangerous concept of Mutual Funds”